Scamera poll |
Post Reply | Page <1 2526272829> |
Author | |||||
livvy
Really Senior Member II Joined: 12-November-2005 Status: Offline Points: 745 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 04:56 | ||||
I didn't think I ever would convince anyone of such, I give my personal opinion the same as others.
Truthfully it's not a place that is likely to harbour much support for them is it ? However despite looking, I haven't seen any convincing argument from anyone here as to why we shouldn't have them & I'd love to hear one if there is. If we are to have speed limits & the cameras only prosecute people breaking those limits how can we argue against that ? We may campaign for different limits, but that is a different argument than cameras enforcing limits. People have said about more officers to deal with other problems that cameras can't & I agree. But why not more officers in general & also cameras at hotspots ? It's no basis saying we shouldn't have something simply because it might catch me doing something illegal. With regards the poll here, is a lack of support here likely to cause government concern or change government policy ? I don't think so. I think they are far more likely to look at & hold greater stock with polls from a wider demographic than a performance car owners forum. They know they have an image problem with cameras, but they know that they have had a positive reduction in speed & KSIs at sites. I don't think they are going to get rid of them. The question for them I think is are they going to have more or use other methods to keep people's speeds down, but they are still going to try to keep people's speed down. If it's not cameras it will be something else. If people think they are going to see an increase in speed limits OR the government are going to turn a blind eye to speeding, then I think they are sticking their heads in the sand & blinding themselves to the contrary evidence of government policy intention. (Reminder to self - check for typo errors in case Spokey blows a gasket.) Edited by livvy |
|||||
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone. |
|||||
Sponsored Links | |||||
IamSpartacus
Moderator Group Joined: 21-November-2002 Location: Singapore Status: Offline Points: 3625 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 05:05 | ||||
I Wasn't for a moment suggesting it was.
Planning ahead, ensuring sufficient braking distances - even if everyone ahead thinks you're leaving space for them to pull in - This is all basic driving skills 101, awareness of other road users yes, anticipation of their next move yes. but there are lot of them out there for me to protect .... which one do I choose? the lovley blonde weaving while she applies her mascara or the hoodie wearing neanderthal that's so close it seems he's trying to mount my car in some display of sexual domination? I think we'll have to agree to disagree on many points discussed here Livvy. But to go full circle and answer one of you earliest questions regarding loss of customer base, you are right, in one sense banning people will cost them money on the long term - but most people don't end up banned just very nervous while they tiptoe around with 6 or 9 points for a couple of years. The same could be said for us poor smokers (yup one o them too!) We put millions into the coffers of Mssrs Brown & Bliar.... do they thank us, no. Do we get inviter round to No 11 for tea & biccies for being a major contributor, no, We get criminalised, shunned as soon told to go stand outside to enjoy our addiction!
I'm off me soapbox and going to seek some harmonious interaction with a Phillips Azure and some Ben Shermans - can't be looking creased or crumpled as I tear up the highways smoking and scaring old ladies now can I . [/QUOTE] |
|||||
The world is a tragedy to those who feel, but a comedy to those who think.
|
|||||
livvy
Really Senior Member II Joined: 12-November-2005 Status: Offline Points: 745 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 05:14 | ||||
Why not do it for them all, you don't have to choose.
True, the numbers banned have not really changed at all whilst the numbers of prosecutions have gone up dramatically. Is this evidence that people change their behaviour ? The government take it that it is, along with (as you say tiptoe) a belief that these people take greater care with their speed as a result, which is the object of the exercise.
Cue Nigel.
I find collar, cuffs, sleeves, back then front best. Edited by livvy |
|||||
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone. |
|||||
IamSpartacus
Moderator Group Joined: 21-November-2002 Location: Singapore Status: Offline Points: 3625 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 06:24 | ||||
And again we differ, collar front back sleeves cuffs for me! All laundry now done so back to the serious business of finding some accomodation!
|
|||||
The world is a tragedy to those who feel, but a comedy to those who think.
|
|||||
spokey
Bavarian-Board Contributor Offensive and obnoxious tub of lard Joined: 02-March-2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1948 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 07:33 | ||||
If I may dare to differ in opinion with as august and knowledgeable a person as yourself, a random drive down any given motorway will clearly show that while certain individual drivers may be tiptoeing around, the vast majority of drivers either drive at about 85-90 MPH (a guess based on how fast they seem to sail past me) or about 60MPH (based on how fast I sail past them) and the HGV's drive at 55MPH. Effectively we already have a three-tier speed limit system and I don't think the differentials I see are particularly good for road safety. The government is clearly misguided if they think that they are changing behaviour overall. They are only changing the behaviour of people unlucky enough to get caught speeding at a given point. The thing that rankles most about the use of scameras is that they are often sited at places where it's very easy to unintentionally break the speed limit and take absolutely no regard for how you drive overall. You may have driven at or below the speed limit for a whole two hours before, and a whole two hours after, but if your attention should drift for just one minute, you could arbitrarily be a criminal. This is why (for me, anyway) it's a subject that means that no matter what the benefits may be, I will never support them. I don't even support them at schools or dangerous junctions, because I find that I focus on my speedo far too much when passing one. |
|||||
Ciao,
Spokey |
|||||
Peter Fenwick
Bavarian-Board Contributor Joined: 27-August-2003 Location: Lost somewhere in time... Status: Offline Points: 6484 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 07:47 | ||||
This is one of the rare occaisions I find myself in agreement with Spokey.
|
|||||
Entering an age of Austerity and now driving a Focus Diesel.
|
|||||
Rhys
Moderator Group Coffee addict... Joined: 02-February-2003 Location: from the Latin locātiō Status: Offline Points: 10053 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 08:35 | ||||
Good job we don't live in America isn't it.. How many of us would stay at their 55mph limit?
Does anyone know the motorway speed limits of other countries, what do they use to enforce these limits (cameras etc) and how effective are they with relation to number of people caught speeding/accidents reported. Thing is are they in relation to the number of cars per mile of motorway or the condition of these roads? I doubt we have the best roads in Europe (out car tax gets spent on other things, like copper cladding government buildings - but to digress) and the number of cars on the road is probably greater now than ever before. |
|||||
V reg Rustbucket Merc C220 Cdi estate
J Reg Saab 900i 16v '63 Ford Anglia 105e deluxe R reg Honda PC50 moped.. No BMW as yet... |
|||||
Nigel
Moderator Group Joined: 09-November-2002 Status: Offline Points: 6941 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 09:08 | ||||
I agree with spokey on many points, I just differ with how I put them across. As for smoking, Derek your a good bloke, Livvy stop being such a wimp , living where you do, and breathing that "air", how can you complain about smoke ! The main thing I hope we are seeing here ( and Livvy has taken the time and patience to teach me ), is we aren't going to get rid of cameras. We of course are in a minority, but not a favoured one like religion, or homosexuals, but like the afforementioned two groups, we do need to band together , somehow, to get our point of view listened to. That itself is the major challenge that will face us in the next few years. We have to come up with an alternate strategy to the government, that will reduce ksi's, and leave our hobby intact. You all know my answer ( advanced driving...regardless of the organisation), what are your options ?, what can you come up with to help ? IF we do nothing, the people in the know advise it will get worse, much much worse as far as we are concerned. Edited by Nigel |
|||||
Best Wishes
Nigel |
|||||
Nigel
Moderator Group Joined: 09-November-2002 Status: Offline Points: 6941 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 09:12 | ||||
Livvy Regarding the poll on here, I know its not representative of the general population, but in my opinion at least, it holds as much water as the ones you quote me ! Either on or off forum, I'd love to see the questions asked in the ones you quote. |
|||||
Best Wishes
Nigel |
|||||
Darren M
Really Senior Member II Joined: 31-October-2002 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 533 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 09:41 | ||||
I disagree with speed cameras or at least many of the locations of them. I do like the new signs that tell you your speed as you approach. Personally, those do have an impact on me, they make you think about your speed and aware of what the speed limit is in that zone - but gatso`s just annoy me.
A speed readign sign followed by a gatso further along the road I would find more acceptable. If you do enough miles, with the current system it is only a matter of time before EVERYONE gets flashed. My first and only time has been when I went to new town I have never been to before(back in Feb this year). I was looking for a place and turning. It was a dual carriageway NOT in a built up areas and I didn`t realise it was a 40. I got busted doing 49 - not too bad considering the circumstances. I didn`t even see the camera so was shocked when later I got a NIP. I fought my NIP via letter explaining some things and it was dropped. |
|||||
|
|||||
Nigel
Moderator Group Joined: 09-November-2002 Status: Offline Points: 6941 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 10:12 | ||||
This is encouraging : http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=2343112005 We could do with a few more pedestrians/cyclists held to account. |
|||||
Best Wishes
Nigel |
|||||
livvy
Really Senior Member II Joined: 12-November-2005 Status: Offline Points: 745 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 14:31 | ||||
GATSOs are advertised & their purpose is to slow you at & in the immeadiate vicinity of identified targeted problem points. They can't hope to enforce change nationally wholesale. Education is the way forward for that as it requires attitude changes. You could drive for 2 hours lapse & get caught by a Police officer. Net result could be the same as a camera couldn't it. If you feel your concentration lapsing take a break. Edited by livvy |
|||||
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone. |
|||||
livvy
Really Senior Member II Joined: 12-November-2005 Status: Offline Points: 745 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 14:33 | ||||
We have the safest roads (in terms of casualty numbers per mile) of virtually any major nation in the world, let alone Europe. |
|||||
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone. |
|||||
Peter Fenwick
Bavarian-Board Contributor Joined: 27-August-2003 Location: Lost somewhere in time... Status: Offline Points: 6484 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 14:53 | ||||
So if our roads are so safe then why is there such a fuss about speeding? |
|||||
Entering an age of Austerity and now driving a Focus Diesel.
|
|||||
livvy
Really Senior Member II Joined: 12-November-2005 Status: Offline Points: 745 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 14:57 | ||||
Perhaps it's because we do what we do that they are the safest.
About 3,200 killed (mostly preventable deaths) & tens of thousands with life threatening or changing injuries is still too many. |
|||||
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone. |
|||||
spokey
Bavarian-Board Contributor Offensive and obnoxious tub of lard Joined: 02-March-2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1948 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 16:51 | ||||
Do you ever listen to the radio? If so, do you ever change the volume? Do you ever change stations or swap the CD or tape? Do you ever find your eye getting caught by something alongside the road? Do you pull to the side of the road before you do any of those things? |
|||||
Ciao,
Spokey |
|||||
spokey
Bavarian-Board Contributor Offensive and obnoxious tub of lard Joined: 02-March-2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1948 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 16:53 | ||||
Yes, and about ten times that killed (all preventable deaths) by hospital-acquired infections is also too many. I don't see the government clamping down on NHS incompetence. |
|||||
Ciao,
Spokey |
|||||
livvy
Really Senior Member II Joined: 12-November-2005 Status: Offline Points: 745 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 17:06 | ||||
My partner works in the NHS & they try very hard actually. I won't dispute that more funding is needed & greater effort from the government & the hospitals themselves. Those figures are not acceptable, but that aside it is no reason to ignore the problem of death & injury on our roads. Edited by livvy |
|||||
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone. |
|||||
Rhys
Moderator Group Coffee addict... Joined: 02-February-2003 Location: from the Latin locātiō Status: Offline Points: 10053 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 17:16 | ||||
I'm going to make a few observations regarding speeding on our motorways.
1. you are more likely to speed if everyone else is also braking the limit (as said before most people drive at or around 80mph) 2. If you are driving on an empty motorway you are likely to brake the limit as you are less aware of the speed you are going with relation to others (or the lack of others) around you. Modern cars are stable at high speeds, I noticed a big difference between an '85 E30 316 which vibrated at 70mph and an '88 E30 320i which would cruise all day long at upto 80mph - my current '95 E36 318ti would probably cruise all day long at 90mph. 2. Speed cameras can cause people to brake even if they aren't going over the limit (can cause braking first then checking of speed) This can cause a knock on effect of making others brake behind them. Is this safe? If you are a habitual speeder, try driving something slow.. After driving a Vitara, which is comfortable at 70 but wouldn't want to go much faster - you become more aware of others driving above the limit - and because you can't then you end up settling down and letting others get on with it (and having the odd laugh at others when they get caught) just a few thoughts, any comments? Edited by Rhys |
|||||
V reg Rustbucket Merc C220 Cdi estate
J Reg Saab 900i 16v '63 Ford Anglia 105e deluxe R reg Honda PC50 moped.. No BMW as yet... |
|||||
spokey
Bavarian-Board Contributor Offensive and obnoxious tub of lard Joined: 02-March-2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1948 |
Posted: 04-December-2005 at 17:25 | ||||
Whereas with driving, it's all down to the driver. No-one else has to do anything. And it can all be cured by stopping people speeding. Result! |
|||||
Ciao,
Spokey |
|||||
Post Reply | Page <1 2526272829> |
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |