Bavarian-Board.co.uk - BMW Owners Discussion Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General Forums > General Off Topic Forum
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - What type of  Police service????
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Forum LockedWhat type of Police service????

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
spokey View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar
Offensive and obnoxious tub of lard

Joined: 02-March-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1948
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-November-2005 at 15:39
Originally posted by livvy livvy wrote:

Average number of homicides per 100,000 population 2000-2002

England & Wales 1.76


Does that include irresponsible speeding drivers?
Ciao,
Spokey

Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
thepits View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 09-July-2003
Location: far far away
Status: Offline
Points: 10000473
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-November-2005 at 15:11

Star Trekking, across the universe..................

"Uhura: There's Klingons on the starboard bow,
starboard bow,
starboard bow.
There's Klingons on the starboard bow,
starboard bow, Jim!

Starship Captain, James T. Kirk

Kirk: Ha-ha! We come in peace, shoot to kill,
shoot to kill,
shoot to kill.
We come in peace, shoot to kill,
shoot to kill, men.

McCoy: It's worse than that, he's dead, Jim.
Dead, Jim.
Dead, Jim.
It's worse than that, he's dead, Jim.
Dead, Jim, Dead. "


Cats know your every thought.

But don't care.
Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-November-2005 at 14:38
Average number of homicides per 100,000 population 2000-2002

England & Wales 1.76
Belgium 7.06
France 1.82
Germany 1.11
EU average 2.48
USA 5.59
Estonia 10.29
Lithuania 10.39
Russia 22.25
South Africa 48.84


My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone.
Back to Top
Robmw View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I
Avatar

Joined: 29-August-2005
Location: Epping
Status: Offline
Points: 311
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-November-2005 at 14:30
I also felt like Rhys that Brazil had terrible gun crime but from the Head of the Met Commissioner Blair speech he stated some figures which I think are appalling per 100,000 head of population - in Europe there are 400 crimes per year,
              in Brazil there are 900 crimes per year,
              in USA there are 4,000 crimes per year,         & nbsp;         & nbsp;         & nbsp; 
        and in UK THERE ARE 11,000 CRIMES PER YEAR

Now I will appreciate that a lot of people will say that this is down to poor reporting in other countries and excellent reporting in this country, personnally I feel this country is becoming lawless and soon protection will come from vigilantism
Robert Born
Back to Top
sleeper View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar
Original and STILL best

Joined: 26-March-2004
Location: East Sussex/Kent border
Status: Offline
Points: 2098
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-November-2005 at 14:27
Originally posted by Nigel Nigel wrote:

I've been removed from a car in Guatamala, at gunpoint, by police so they could search for drugs.

I have been over here, by 3 ARV's and a helicopter, new pants? yes please!

Originally posted by Nigel Nigel wrote:

It isn't nice, I don't speak the lingo, but I'm still alive, I may not be if I'd run !

I've been locked up by yanks on the usa/mexican border because the dopey gits can't read, but you don't resist ( and I even had the lingo in that case).

Anyone crossed a border into china? You can't even LOOK at the guards (who have loaded AK47's, WITH THE SAFETY OFF)!

That's scary, but no matter what language, if they shout, you freeze! 

Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-November-2005 at 11:03
Originally posted by scarface scarface wrote:

TBH I can't remember who was alleging it at the time, it was on the news.  So it must be true!   


Must be then.
Just like the news said he ran, no he didn't, he ran, no he didn't.


Edited by livvy
My views expressed are just that.
Mine & mine alone.
Back to Top
Peter Fenwick View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 27-August-2003
Location: Lost somewhere in time...
Status: Offline
Points: 6484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-November-2005 at 06:58

Originally posted by scarface scarface wrote:

- Not a Daily Mail reader btw

Good, there are enough of them out there already....

Entering an age of Austerity and now driving a Focus Diesel.
Back to Top
scarface View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I
Avatar

Joined: 16-June-2004
Location: Surrey, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 414
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-November-2005 at 06:05
TBH I can't remember who was alleging it at the time, it was on the news.  So it must be true!   
Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-November-2005 at 02:00
Originally posted by scarface scarface wrote:

There were delays on getting evidence, and the police were being obstructive.  For one the CCTV tapes cannot be found/were blank from the cameras covering the incident.


Who said that ?
The IPCC ?


Back to Top
scarface View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I
Avatar

Joined: 16-June-2004
Location: Surrey, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 414
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-November-2005 at 18:28
There were delays on getting evidence, and the police were being obstructive.  For one the CCTV tapes cannot be found/were blank from the cameras covering the incident. 

I agree that the fact he was an illegal doesn't have anything to do with the shooting, unless he did run.  Even then you shouldn't be shot for running from the police, it could have been you or I.  All I am saying is that to be prepared to use lethal force on someone that you have no intelligence on is crazy. 

We will wait for the findings of the enquiry. 
Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-November-2005 at 16:28
Originally posted by Nigel Nigel wrote:

I think Livvy, it may have a bearing, he ran, lets be honest, if he'd stood still and put his hands up he'd still be with us.

Suicide bombers are a new threat for us, mistakes are likely no matter how regrettable, but if someone points a gun at you and shouts armed police, you must stand still.

I've been removed from a car in Guatamala, at gunpoint, by police so they could search for drugs.

It isn't nice, I don't speak the lingo, but I'm still alive, I may not be if I'd run !

I've been locked up by yanks on the usa/mexican border because the dopey gits can't read, but you don't resist ( and I even had the lingo in that case).



We don't know yet Nigel that he did run. We only have our press saying that he did & then saying that he didn't & then saying that he did.

We will have to wait for the enquiry & IPCC investigation to publish it's findings. With a press desperate to have a story on the matter & the Police neither confirming or denying those stories, that seems like the only sensible course of action.


Edited by livvy
Back to Top
Nigel View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 09-November-2002
Status: Offline
Points: 6941
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-November-2005 at 15:57

I think Livvy, it may have a bearing, he ran, lets be honest, if he'd stood still and put his hands up he'd still be with us.

Suicide bombers are a new threat for us, mistakes are likely no matter how regrettable, but if someone points a gun at you and shouts armed police, you must stand still.

I've been removed from a car in Guatamala, at gunpoint, by police so they could search for drugs.

It isn't nice, I don't speak the lingo, but I'm still alive, I may not be if I'd run !

I've been locked up by yanks on the usa/mexican border because the dopey gits can't read, but you don't resist ( and I even had the lingo in that case).

Best Wishes

Nigel

Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-November-2005 at 14:05
What are you alleging ?

Evidence going missing, what evidence has gone missing ?

Him being an illegal immigrant has little to do with this to my mind. The terrorists in the July bombings weren't after all & he wasn't approached because of his immigration status.


Edited by livvy
Back to Top
scarface View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I
Avatar

Joined: 16-June-2004
Location: Surrey, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 414
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-November-2005 at 13:42
Jean Charles de Menezes was an illegal, granted.  I have no time for illegals.  But he could have easily not been.   Let us not forget it was said that he was followed because he lived in a flat near where one of the bombers was thought to have lived, and he looked a bit foreign.  It also emerged that he was actually not wearing heavy clothing and didn't have a bag, so where was the bomb conceiled?  It was also found that he used a ticket to get through the barrier, instead of the initial report that he ran, vaulting the barrier.  I take the terrorist threat very seriously being someone that spends a lot of time on the tube, but we have to be careful. 

Let's just hope that the public enquiry can come to a definite conclusion given the evidence that they have been given, it's a shame so much evidence goes missing immediately after a mistake. 

- Not a Daily Mail reader btw
Back to Top
livvy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 12-November-2005
Status: Offline
Points: 745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-November-2005 at 04:39
Originally posted by Peter Fenwick Peter Fenwick wrote:

Originally posted by B 7 VP B 7 VP wrote:

" yes--its worrying isnt it--SO many Appeals after the Courts  verdicts--So many Reviews--so many miscarrage,s of so called justice, it really does give one confidence in --you ARE innocent untill proven guilty--what a fine old tradition of the wigs and gowns of yesteryear- unlike Now, when you are Guilty untill you can prove your innocence----youre joking-of course" !!!!!!!!!!

I don't worry about it. There are some miscarridges of justice sure but how many cases a put through the courts without any problems?

You only here about the ones where it has gone wrong because they're the ones that get reported on.

I've only ever had one direct experience of the court system and it work for me.




Yes,
any casual impartial observer of our system could see that B 7 VP is talking complete tosh. The burden of proof is clearly on the prosecution & if there are a lot of miscarriages of justice, they are that a lot of guilty people get off. Still that is part of the safeguards of the system, to try & ensure that an innocent is not wrongly convicted. It does of course still happen, but rarely.
For everyone of those wrongly convicted, probably thousands of guilty walk free, in attempt to limit those other miscarriages.

But if we put the blinkers on & stare at one thing, we of course lose sight of the bigger picture.


Edited by livvy
Back to Top
Peter Fenwick View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 27-August-2003
Location: Lost somewhere in time...
Status: Offline
Points: 6484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-November-2005 at 04:05

Originally posted by spokey spokey wrote:


Let's hear it for a great, modern, liberal democracy!

I think maybe you and B7VP should go and live in a country where they genuinely don't have any freedom. Then maybe you might be less quick to make jibes about this country.

Oh and Spokey, i thought you were right wing, not liberal!

Entering an age of Austerity and now driving a Focus Diesel.
Back to Top
Peter Fenwick View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar

Joined: 27-August-2003
Location: Lost somewhere in time...
Status: Offline
Points: 6484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-November-2005 at 03:59
Originally posted by B 7 VP B 7 VP wrote:

" But YOU accept everything the Daily Mirror and The Sun sickup each day " and accept Phony Bliars Gospel of St Bush". 

No I don't. Unfortunately in this day and age everything we see and here has to be considered carefully. There is so much political spin put on everything that it is hard to know what is true and what is lies.

BTW I don't read any newspapers because most of them a re full of propaganda for one party or another. Sorry, I do read one paper, the Darlington & Stockton times, because my Wife writes for them

I find the TV news a bit more reliable, although I accept it is also not without it's political agenda. To balance it out I watch Sky news and the BBC news

Originally posted by B 7 VP B 7 VP wrote:

" yes--its worrying isnt it--SO many Appeals after the Courts  verdicts--So many Reviews--so many miscarrage,s of so called justice, it really does give one confidence in --you ARE innocent untill proven guilty--what a fine old tradition of the wigs and gowns of yesteryear- unlike Now, when you are Guilty untill you can prove your innocence----youre joking-of course" !!!!!!!!!!

I don't worry about it. There are some miscarridges of justice sure but how many cases a put through the courts without any problems?

You only here about the ones where it has gone wrong because they're the ones that get reported on.

I've only ever had one direct experience of the court system and it work for me.

Entering an age of Austerity and now driving a Focus Diesel.
Back to Top
Nigel View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 09-November-2002
Status: Offline
Points: 6941
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-November-2005 at 20:14

HIs visa to stay in this country had expired, so he is an illegal immigrant !

If he doesn't understand the words " armed police stop", then tough , harsh but true.

Lets not get too easy on this, he was in England, the language is English, and according to his family, he was fluent anyway.

Spend some time in Countries where the police carry guns as a way of life, carry weapons yourself,  things start to look different.

Best Wishes

Nigel

Back to Top
Rhys View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Coffee addict...

Joined: 02-February-2003
Location: from the Latin locātiō
Status: Offline
Points: 10053
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-November-2005 at 18:37
Originally posted by Nigel Nigel wrote:


We have an illegal immigrant who runs from armed police when challeneged, and runs onto a tube train, just after some terrorist attacks, if I'd have been the officer, I'd have fired too, probably before he did.



This illegal immigrant happend to be Brazilian did he not?
A country where gun crime is prolific.
What about his understanding of English, could he understand what was said to him?
A load of blokes with guns are running towards you, shouting.. what would you do? I'd peg it as well - I wouldn't want to hang around to see what they wanted, just like he'd probably do in Brazil.
V reg Rustbucket Merc C220 Cdi estate
J Reg Saab 900i 16v
'63 Ford Anglia 105e deluxe
R reg Honda PC50 moped..

No BMW as yet...
Back to Top
spokey View Drop Down
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Bavarian-Board Contributor
Avatar
Offensive and obnoxious tub of lard

Joined: 02-March-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1948
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-November-2005 at 18:13
It's funny how when people out of Westminster feel like their way of life is threatened, they get told that the law is sufficient. However, when the people in Westminster feel like their way of life is threatened, they can introduce all sorts of draconian b*ll*cks, often without understanding the capabilities of existing laws.

Sneaky, too: introduce an outrageously draconian violation of our civil liberties, so that when it gets cut from 90 to 28 days, everyone feels like their rights have been defended, yet the police still have the right to arrest Labour Party members who dare to heckle a speaker and hold them in jail for 28 days without charge. Or arrest people who happen to look a bit foreign because they are carrying a rucksack, fingerprint them, record their DNA and screw up their lives forever with a criminal record, utterly without reason.



Let's hear it for a great, modern, liberal democracy!


Ciao,
Spokey

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.