Bavarian-Board.co.uk - BMW Owners Discussion Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Technical & Model Specific Forums > BMW ///M Power
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Trigger wheels for Aftermarket ECU/EMS
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Forum LockedTrigger wheels for Aftermarket ECU/EMS

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
jpboost View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I


Joined: 24-June-2005
Location: London, GB
Status: Offline
Points: 292
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Trigger wheels for Aftermarket ECU/EMS
    Posted: 20-March-2006 at 04:07
I'm toying with the idea of fitting aftermarket engine management to my E30 m3.
I know a lot of people go for the MAXX Alpha N, but I'd prefer to be able to map ignition too.  Especially as total cost shouldn't be all that different.
 
I won't be able to afford Motec, so it's likley I'll be running OMEX or Emerald.  I've still got a fair bit of research to do, but I'm thinking of this as a project for later in the year certainly not for the next few months.
 
Shortly (in the next month or so) I've got to take my engine out to do some bodywork.  While the engine is out, I thought I'd fit the crank trigger wheel that I'd need to run my EMS.  For any of those who are running some sort of EMS, what wheel did you use?    I'm pretty sure the motec runs on the std sensors, but I don't think the ones I'm talking about do.  I know most EMS will run using any of the std wheels (36-1 , 60-2 etc) but I was just tyring to see what others have done.
 
Who else out there is running aftermarket EMS?
 
Anyone got a spare crank pulley they want to sell so I can get prepared before taking the car off the road?
 
Cheers
John
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
BMG M3 View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 26-April-2003
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1594
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 04:29
Its a shameless plug, but there is a crank pulley on eBay right now
Back to Top
jpboost View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I


Joined: 24-June-2005
Location: London, GB
Status: Offline
Points: 292
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 04:52

I had noticed that Brian,

You may well gain a bidder :)

Back to Top
UweM3 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 11-February-2003
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 5445
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 05:07
MOTEC doesn't use BMW trigger wheel BTW.
I would go for EMERAD. You can't beat the price they are asking for the mapping.
No offence, but are you able to map iginition? And all the other stuff? (cold enrichment, accel enrich, temp compensation blablabla)
Maybe worth talking to 215DMX. He's done a lot of research for his MOTEC.
E61 520d, slow and buzzy but my wallet likes the mpg.....
Back to Top
Karlp View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I


Joined: 21-March-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 354
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 05:12

I have done this for my DTA engine management system.

36 -1 wheel with sensor mounted below water pump.

The most difficult thing to do was to mount the wheel on the pulley - in that the first time I did it the mounting bolts  (4mm) sheared after one track day.  I was told that the inertia forces can do this.

It is now mounted using a 10mm by 6mm steel ring that is welded to the trigger wheel and then radially secured to the crank pulley using four 6mm allen key bolts.

This setup is fine.

Make sure you incorporated some sort of adjustment for the accurate alignment of the sensor. You may be told that you can adjust for misalignement of the sensor in the software BUT if done correctly you wil be able to use another DTA or Emerald ECU by just plugging it in rather than resetting parameters.

My engine is out at present being rebuilt so I can take pics very easily at any angle.

THIS WILL NEED MAPPING BY SOMEONE TO GET THE BEST OUT OF IT  and for DTA expect about £450.

 

Karl



Edited by Karlp
Back to Top
jpboost View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I


Joined: 24-June-2005
Location: London, GB
Status: Offline
Points: 292
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 05:21

Karl,

I'd be very interested to see some pics of the trigger wheel/sensor mounting. With the adjustmetn in the software, I'd not thought too much about the actual positioning... but I will now.

Did you use a DTA wheel? Have you mounted the wheel on the inside or outside of the pulley?

Uwe,

No offence taken.  I'd like to think I'm capable, but I suppose I'll just have to find out.  I also know a couple of people who have done a fair amount of mapping before, so I can call on them if needed. I also have another project car that will be getting a mappable ECU (ign only on a turbo mini) so it's something I have to get to grips with anyway.

I also live just  round the corner from 215DMX, so if this project goes ahead, I'm sure I'll drag him to the pub to discuss load sites etc...(I'm sure he'll be ever so glad to read this!   )

John

 

 



Edited by jpboost
Back to Top
Karlp View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I


Joined: 21-March-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 354
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 05:37

I did get the wheel from DTA - but it is no different than anything else (plenty on ebay) just more expensive.  It is mounted on the inside of the hub.  The flange is reduced and the mounting ring 'turned' to fit.

 

Karl



Edited by Karlp
Back to Top
stevesingo View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 03-January-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 795
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 05:37

John,

I run motec and it uses a 36-1 trigger mounted on the pully.    It mounts with three M6 bolts and is easy enough to mount.

Triggers will have somthing suitable.

If you are going to run sequential injection then you will nee a camshaft sensor also. Gustave and others on S14.net have done a lot of work on this and I think someone has some spare kits to facilitate this also.

If you are going the sequentioal route then you will need to do some work on your wiring loom as the injrctors are wired in pairs as stock. Whilst your at it you might as well go for distributoless ingnition too.

Oh the fun to be had.

Steve
Back to Top
jpboost View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I


Joined: 24-June-2005
Location: London, GB
Status: Offline
Points: 292
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 05:59
Originally posted by Karlp Karlp wrote:

I did get the wheel from DTA - but it is no different than anything else (plenty on ebay) just more expensive.  It is mounted on the inside of the hub.  The flange is reduced and the mounting ring 'turned' to fit.

Looks like I'll be digging the lathe out then .

I'll PM you my email for some photos if that's ok..

Thanks

 

Steve,

Dizzy less is something I will definitely be doing.  Sequential may be out of my budget...

*goes off to start searching fro more details on sequential injection*

 



Edited by jpboost
Back to Top
UweM3 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 11-February-2003
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 5445
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 06:14
Loosing the dizzy is probably one of biggest benefits of an aftermarket ECU.
But I am not sure if it's worth the effort for sequential injection.
We're talking of improvements behind the comma IMHO.
But if you're like to fiddle around with things it's worth it
E61 520d, slow and buzzy but my wallet likes the mpg.....
Back to Top
stevesingo View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 03-January-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 795
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 06:18
Originally posted by UweM3 UweM3 wrote:

Loosing the dizzy is probably one of biggest benefits of an aftermarket ECU.
But I am not sure if it's worth the effort for sequential injection.
We're talking of improvements behind the comma IMHO.
But if you're like to fiddle around with things it's worth it


IF your doint the work to put the cam trigger in, you might as well double up the injector wiring and go the whole hog.

Already got a spare loom to look in to it

Steve
Back to Top
Karlp View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I


Joined: 21-March-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 354
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 06:20

I thought about sequential ignition but - not worth it.

There seems to be two schools of thought.

1. Sequential - inject a specific amount but it has to vapourize efficently and get into the combustion chamber quickly.

2. Batch injection - where the injection into the 'unused' cylinders gets vapourised and is ready for the 'proper' injection.

 

Not sure which is best but for sequential need cam sensor, more loom.

Personally I do not think it is worth the extra effort.

Karl

Back to Top
215DMX View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 14-May-2003
Location: Croydon
Status: Offline
Points: 1780
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 06:28
John, you can use all sorts of trigger wheels/ sensors off other vehicles,
what comes off a Granada is a well used option.

You can buy a crank pully pre-drilled and with a trigger wheel off
Powerstation as well as the sensor bracket, I doubt that would be too
much. The wheel is an off the shelf item. You could then use this to plug
into any system. Easy tried and tested.

It all depends how much 'effort' you want to put into building a loom to
go with it. Personally as you know, unless you are going for outright race
spec engine/ track day car with seqential injection, COP etc,   I believe the
MaXX kit is better as it uses all the std parameters, sensors etc. It isn't
too much trouble to get a decent ignition map sorted and burned onto
the chip. All of which makes better sence on a road car.

As Uwe can testfy with the MaXX you can carry just a few parts in the boot
to convert back to standard on the side of the road in very little time if
something goes wrong. Things like that make sence to me on a road car.

Going to COP, is quite involved. Only VAC in the states (as far as I know)
produces any off the shelf parts to use a ref/ sync sensor (E34 M5 style)
Obviously you can use a ignition expander sytem with seperate coils, but
you still need a sync sensor. Otherwise you will need to have parts CNC
machined to fit your needs.

Again though, I don't think you will see any noticable benefit in
performance for the trouble and outlay. Same goes for sequntaial.

Better off spending the money on decent head work, cams, pistons........!

Why not get you head ported while the engine is out, keep the std cams
for now and go for a Maxx. Toby did this and he's got 240hp....

Unless you want to make me an offer for mine......lots of whisles and bells
to play with    ;-)


Edited by 215DMX
Back to Top
stevesingo View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 03-January-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 795
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 06:29
Motec 36-1 trigger





Steve
Back to Top
jpboost View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I


Joined: 24-June-2005
Location: London, GB
Status: Offline
Points: 292
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 06:53
I agree that sequential and COP are probably far too much for what I need. and too expensive.
 
It just seems sensible to spend a little more to get a system that can do the ignition as well, rather than just the fuel. Things like losing the dizzy are a bonus. 
 
The engine loom on my car is a also a bit of a worry, the amount of rodent damage (don't laugh) is an unknown entity, so running new loom for the new ecu seems like quite a sensible idea. 
 
I can see the argument behind such a simple converion like the MAXX, but I'm not sure it does everything I want. ( I do realise that it probably is an easier way to what I 'need' though)
 
Cheers for the offer Dave,  I'll make some enquiries and see how expensive the other options are.  Then we can discuss over that pint.
 
 
Back to Top
215DMX View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 14-May-2003
Location: Croydon
Status: Offline
Points: 1780
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 06:58
Be aware John, getting rid of the dizzy, and builing a new loom for all the
other elements invloves some work and won't be cheap even if the ECU unit
itself looks like a good deal.

Why exactly do you 'need' to go 'dizzy-less' ?
Back to Top
jpboost View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I


Joined: 24-June-2005
Location: London, GB
Status: Offline
Points: 292
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 07:17

I think it probably stems from it being the recommended thing to do for so many other engines.  Whenever looking at properly tuning engines, I've always been led to belive that dizzys (and the timing scatter they introduce) were best avoided.

It's not a goal I'd specifically chase on it's own, but if I was spending money on some sort of management, it's something i'd certainly try to include...

Back to Top
215DMX View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 14-May-2003
Location: Croydon
Status: Offline
Points: 1780
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 07:36
John, still uses a dizzy on his 330hp Group A engine with std ignition
parts... I think the std ignition on the e30 M3 is pretty good out of the box.

Alot of the other cars/ engines, you could be refering to most likely don't
start out with such an advanced ecu which has quite good ignition drivers
built in.

Edited by 215DMX
Back to Top
Karlp View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I


Joined: 21-March-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 354
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 08:04

Regarding costs -for a DTA system this is what I spent.

DTA  599

Loom 299

Ignition coil (to go distributorless )  £10 from ebay  50 normally

Trigger wheel  40  (in hindsight too expensive)

Injectors 250  (depends on impedence needed by ECU)

Sensors  60  (need crank trigger and air temp)

TPS - cannot remember but about 30

Mapping  450

all + VAT where applicable.

Karl

Back to Top
jpboost View Drop Down
Really Senior Member I
Really Senior Member I


Joined: 24-June-2005
Location: London, GB
Status: Offline
Points: 292
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-March-2006 at 08:06

point taken.

Also the last one I was playing with was highly strung forced induction, so reliable accurate ignition was critical to avoid meltdown!

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.145 seconds.