Bavarian-Board.co.uk - BMW Owners Discussion Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Technical & Model Specific Forums > BMW ///M Power
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Most effective engine mods on E30 M3?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Forum LockedMost effective engine mods on E30 M3?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
Andyboy View Drop Down
Banned User
Banned User
Avatar

Joined: 04-June-2003
Status: Offline
Points: 707
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Most effective engine mods on E30 M3?
    Posted: 29-February-2004 at 14:31
Who has fitted cams, exhausts and alternative induction systems to their M3? I've heard of Motec, but what do you reckon? Applies to 2.3 and 2.5 cars.
Who actually got real power figures, and what did the bits cost?
Worthwhile or not..................?
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
therealmccoy View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 27-April-2003
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 552
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-February-2004 at 16:08
I fitted Shrick 274 cams to an S14, power increased to 231.7 BHP, torque also up. In my opinion, cams are the best mod. They give the most power difference for the money. I payed £3k, but that also included the engine rebuild.

James
Work Harder! A Million Benefit Claimants Depend On YOU!

E30 M3, The REAL McCoy!

89 M3 Now Sold

99 323i *FOR SALE*

PC Probs?? Click here!
Back to Top
jon90 View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 11-January-2003
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 653
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-February-2004 at 18:13
Depends what you use the car for.If its an every day car then I would do no more than a custom remap, you will be amazed at the differance.Mine went from 208bhp to 216bhp,but thats not the whole story,its better every where,almost a joy to drive in traffic.£350.
284/276 Shricks,with custom remap.Again mine went from 216bhp to 234bhp.Ideal if you like a few track days, not so good for better driving days.                     Moves the powerband up the range a bit,so you lose a little bit low down.but from 5-7800rpm goes very well.£1200.
284/284 remap 240/5bhp.Bit of a pain in town, as you get nowt for nowt.But when it goes wow!£1200.
2.5 I`ll let you know.But judging by what others get about 250bhp with the 284/276 combo and with alpha N about 265bhp.and very driveable.Just the engine about £3500/4 as I already have the cams.
Jon
Back to Top
Andyboy View Drop Down
Banned User
Banned User
Avatar

Joined: 04-June-2003
Status: Offline
Points: 707
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-February-2004 at 18:33
I guess a pair of good used cams from a 215 bhp car will fit an earlier 200 bhp (or 195 bhp) car and give a boost.
Which is better; Alpha N or Motec?
Back to Top
jon90 View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 11-January-2003
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 653
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-February-2004 at 19:01
I would have thought you would get some gain,but dont forget the 215bhp cars have bigger throttle bodies,different heads,exhaust manifold and possibly air filter housing?
Motec is one of the best out there,but its £££`s
Jon
Back to Top
piratepete View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 10-February-2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 71
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-February-2004 at 19:44

 

 I would go along with jonjo a custom remap is the best value for money my car pushed out 225 bhp standard with a miltek after remapping at bexleys, cost £400. I later fitted the schrick cams £1200 not realy very good as far as bangs for your bucks go. If you start looking at 2.5 rebuilds and motec you need to budget £6000 - £8000. The motec system is good but you could buy a left hook e46 m3 for 25k if you really need lots of power.

 cheers

PIRATE PETE
Back to Top
John W View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 01-November-2002
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-February-2004 at 22:41
Originally posted by Andyboy Andyboy wrote:

I guess a pair of good used cams from a 215 bhp car will fit an earlier 200 bhp (or 195 bhp) car and give a boost.
Which is better; Alpha N or Motec?




MoTec is a brand/company (Australian!) whereas alpha-N refers to what a MoTec computer contributes to doing. Alpha-N is a type of set up that fundamentally changes the way an engine with an air flow meter works (it is not a brand).
A standard E30 M3 has a Bosch Motronic engine management computer and an air flow mter (AFM). The Motronic computer needs to know the air flow measurement in order to decide how much fuel to put in the cylinders and also the ignition timing at any given point in time. The alpha-N set up doesn't need an AFM. It measures the revs of the engine, the position of your throttle, plus things like manifold pressure, air temp, exhaust gas make-up (the lambda sensor) and then it decides how much fuel to put in (the fuel map) and the ignition timing (ignition map).
So why does it make the engine more powerful? Because in an engine like the S14, the AFM is the biggest limiting factor in the power it can make. The AFM is ditched when you fit an alpha-N set-up. Alpha-N set-ups give you more power throughout the rev range, whereas cams and a remap give you most of the benefit at the top end.
However, it is more expensive. Powerstation in Gloucester are the MoTec gurus and they will fit MoTec plus all its fancy sensors and looms and maop the thing on the rolling road for £2500 including VAT. Cams and a re-map somes to £1200. So Alpha-N (using MoTec hardware) is twice the price. However, if I was able to have only one upgrade and money wasn't a problem, I'd go MoTec (ie alpha-N).
There are other companies that supply plug and play alpha-N solutions for S14 engines. Maxx is one (I think m3pilot, Martin is putting this on his) and it is cheaper.....but I don't know how easy it is to map. Will it be lumpy? What will tick-over be like? With MoTec I guarantee the engine will run beautifully.
My Sport Evo started with 225 BHP on Bexleys rollers. 284/272 cams, Milltek exhaust and the MoTec got power up to 252 BHP and torque went up from 180 to 200 lb/ft. Not cheap.....but it was very fast. Andy O'Hara's Sport Evo with MoTec, Milltek and 284/284 cams made 263 BHP.

In my opinion all E30 M3s would be best off with 250 BHP.....the chassis can easily take it. The problem is it costs a lot to do this.
Back to Top
UweM3 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 11-February-2003
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 5445
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-February-2004 at 23:51
JohnW, mine was doing 251 on Bexley's dyno with the AFM and no Motec, so what's the point of spending 2500? I know you will say the throttle respone is so much more crisp, but is that worth 2500??? On track the throttle is anyway most of the time fully open. I always thought I need Alpha-N, but for now I am fine.
E61 520d, slow and buzzy but my wallet likes the mpg.....
Back to Top
John W View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 01-November-2002
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-March-2004 at 09:30
Originally posted by UweM3 UweM3 wrote:

JohnW, mine was doing 251 on Bexley's dyno with the AFM and no Motec, so what's the point of spending 2500? I know you will say the throttle respone is so much more crisp, but is that worth 2500??? On track the throttle is anyway most of the time fully open. I always thought I need Alpha-N, but for now I am fine.


If yours has alpha-N it would be putting out 260-270 BHP. I'm serious. Everyone seems to get 10-20 BHP gain throughout the rev range. And that's the crucial thing....throughout!!
You need to look at the before and after power figures in my post. The cams and MoTec with new exhaust made 27 BHP and 20 lb/ft difference....but it felt like much more! Your engine is obviously healthier than mine was before we modified it. This means you have even more to gain. You could even end up with more power than Andy O'hara...he get 263 BHP. What cams do you have? Are you up for the challenge?!!!!!!!!!!
Back to Top
Eamo View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 13-May-2003
Location: Ireland
Status: Offline
Points: 3450
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-March-2004 at 09:39
Uwe -

What have you done to extract that much power??
Back to Top
UweM3 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 11-February-2003
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 5445
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-March-2004 at 10:41
2.5 conversion with BMW EVO3 pistons, 290cams, a little bit of head modification, 10.9 compression. And some custom mapping of course (thanks Nigel).
John, if I imagine that this was achived with the exhaust pictured below, a standard 215bhp head with standard valves(no EVO3 here)and the smallest header, how much more is left to gain?
My onest opinion? there isn't that much more like everybody thinks. Otherwise I would end up with 300bhp haha.
251+20Alpha-N+8Miltek+don't know high compression pistons+EVO3 header=????
The overall package can surely be improved, but I am cautious about all this +20 figures.

E61 520d, slow and buzzy but my wallet likes the mpg.....
Back to Top
John W View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 01-November-2002
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-March-2004 at 14:55
Originally posted by UweM3 UweM3 wrote:

2.5 conversion with BMW EVO3 pistons, 290cams, a little bit of head modification, 10.9 compression. And some custom mapping of course (thanks Nigel).
John, if I imagine that this was achived with the exhaust pictured below, a standard 215bhp head with standard valves(no EVO3 here)and the smallest header, how much more is left to gain?
My onest opinion? there isn't that much more like everybody thinks. Otherwise I would end up with 300bhp haha.
251+20Alpha-N+8Miltek+don't know high compression pistons+EVO3 header=????
The overall package can surely be improved, but I am cautious about all this +20 figures.



Well Uwe.....there is only one way to find out.....talk to Powerstation!! And let's see MoTec by the summer!!
Back to Top
UweM3 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 11-February-2003
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 5445
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-March-2004 at 16:52
no way mate! I will invest the money in some tyres and track time.

Uwe
(and I hope you come along with your overgrown beetle to give me a hard time)
E61 520d, slow and buzzy but my wallet likes the mpg.....
Back to Top
John W View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 01-November-2002
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-March-2004 at 18:04
Originally posted by UweM3 UweM3 wrote:

no way mate! I will invest the money in some tyres and track time.

Uwe
(and I hope you come along with your overgrown beetle to give me a hard time)


I will try to get to Donny if you lot go there. However, my Porsche was designed for driving slowly down the high street looking at birds. They do a twin turbo model with 4 wheel drive which is more directly descended from the Beetle....I hope to have one of those before long.....then I'll race ya!!
Back to Top
215DMX View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 14-May-2003
Location: Croydon
Status: Offline
Points: 1780
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-March-2004 at 10:57
What's peoples call on cams here, most say keeping the inlet / exhaust staggerd ie like std (or 284/272 etc) is the way to go. How does having equal inlet / exhaust cams ( 284/ 284)affect the engine charaterisics / powerband?
Back to Top
lancelotII View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II


Joined: 24-November-2002
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 853
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-March-2004 at 11:37
The offset cam setup is probably because on a well designed engine the exhaust should flow about 85% of the inlet. On the s14 it's closer to 120% !!!!!!! hence the reason why the standard exhaust manifold is just about the best, others may make one or two bhp here and there but no significant improvement.

I have the same size cams, and the effect is a little more power higher up the rev range. The downside is a bit less tourque at lower revs.

Back to Top
Andyboy View Drop Down
Banned User
Banned User
Avatar

Joined: 04-June-2003
Status: Offline
Points: 707
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-March-2004 at 18:39
Thanks John, food for thought. The Motec is pricey though. The main problem with the AFM is that the big alloy flap is a serious detriment to air flow. When my Dad owned AmD (you may have heard of them being a Porsche pilot now....) they did a conversion on the 1983 - 88 911 Carrera 3.2 which had Motronic. It was converted to an air mass meter similar to those used on cars like the E36 where a plastic tube has a heated wire - the more air that goes through, the cooler the wire gets and the ECU takes readings from this. This used to give excellent results - about 10 or 15 bhp from memory. Dad's semi retired now but always up to stuff - a decent air mass meter conversion for the E30 M3 at a fraction of the Motec cost?
By the way, the Sport Evo used the same air flow meter as the E32 730i/735i and the E34 530i/535i should anyone bullsh*t owners into thinking that it's a rare part! (It's an 0280 203 027)
Back to Top
grant w View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 26-February-2003
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 558
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-March-2004 at 19:53
i bought my evo sport AFM with a e34 535i part number from german and swedish for £110 cheaper than the stealers wanted , i only differance is the 535i is mounted the other way up to a e30 m3 ..

www.redevom3.co.uk
1989 e30 m3 2.5
1996 e36 m3 evo , sold
2002 e46 m3 smg .
1991 Daihatsu 2.8 TD Work Horse
Rust Never Sleeps . Tattooed Lady - Bearded Baby - there my family ..
Back to Top
Andyboy View Drop Down
Banned User
Banned User
Avatar

Joined: 04-June-2003
Status: Offline
Points: 707
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-March-2004 at 09:20
So, what are the exact differences between the regular 200 bhp car and the 215 bhp/220 bhp cars? Anybody know what the ECU numbers are on their cars inc SpEvo? (remove the trim panel under the steering column and look up at the ECU. Number begins with 0261)

Thanx!
Back to Top
M3Nally View Drop Down
Really Senior Member II
Really Senior Member II
Avatar

Joined: 28-May-2003
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1302
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-March-2004 at 09:46
Andyboy,

An Air mass meter together with a custom remap could be just what the doctor ordered for those not wanting to spend thousands for a bit of extra oomph and drivability.

Personally I'd be happy to just get rid of the chug chug when starting from cold.

Sound like a project for your dad then?

As for differences between 200 and 215/220, I know the latter had bigger throttle bodies, up from 46mm to 48 mm I think. The 220bhp has more agressive cams and sodium filled valves for better cooling, not sure if they are then same as 215 though.
220 had higher 11;1 comp ratio and with more torque 180lb/ft, so they also ran a higher diff of 3.15;1 from 3.25;1. giving lower revs for more relaxed motorway driving, though for competition the reason would have been for higher top speed I presume!


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.145 seconds.