Nonsense thread

I wouldn't worry about trying to defeat cameras with technology, if you achieved something you wouldn't be able to sell it, as it would be peverting justice or something similar if used.

I honestly think weve lost this one, they are raising over �100,000,000.00 a year now in fines, according to radio four, read it again, one hundred million pounds sterling !

Doesn't matter what the road safety arguments are, this slime government isn't going to give up that kind of money.

I don't know how it could be arranged, but we need everyone to drive 10 mph below the speed limit for a few months, put the scamera partnerships out of business, and hopefully grind the country to a halt.

I was thinking the same thing about the limit Mell.

To be a 70 it has to either say 70 ( this seems to be a scottish thing, the rest of us seem to use the NSL sign ).

Or

It has to be an NSL sign ( white circle with a black line diagonaly across it ), and it also needs to be a dual carrageway ( the number of lanes doesn't matter, but there needs to be a central reservation).

So , for example, a four lane road, no central reservation, NSL sign = 60 mph limit ( for cars ).

Ok sweetness we have that bit , are you sure the speed limit was/is 70 mph is what we were asking lol.

If , for example, it was 60 mph, then you are above the 10% + 2 mph allowed (68 mph).

I don't know the road you were driving on, and although I have known scamera vans issue nip's for 2 mph over the limit ( Avon & Somerset ), I've never known it of a fixed camera, as that would be against the guidelines

Nigel wrote: If , for example, it was 60 mph, then you are above the 10% + 2 mph allowed (68 mph).

nearly

ACPO guidelines (and they are just that, guidelines, not hard and fast rules and as such police forces can use their own discretion) prosecute at 10% + 2, so youd be alright at 67 mph, but get nicked at 68